Do you know a virtuous person?

Who do you know who is courageous?

Wise?

Disciplined?

Just?

Do you know anyone who embodies all four of these cardinal virtues?

How much better would things be if you had a boss like this? A coworker or employee?

How would the world improve if we had leaders like this?

It’s hard to succeed with only one or two. You need all four to be truly effective.

The German soldiers who steamrolled Europe were courageous and disciplined. But they were brave and disciplined for the most unwise and unjust of reasons.

You can probably think of several people who were incredibly wise… But who lacked the courage to stand up and do the right thing when the time called for action.

We need more virtuous people in the world.

They aren’t born this way. They make themselves so.

Touching the hot stove

Sometimes, you just have to let people touch the metaphorical hot stove.

We work so hard to enact safeguards that protect people from making poor choices. But those safeguards are often viewed as a shackle on individual liberty, either because they don’t understand or don’t care.

For many, experiencing the consequences of their actions and choices is the only way they’ll learn.

The problem is that, in a society as interconnected and dependent as ours, those of us who know the stove is hot often get burned in the process.

We don’t know if we’re living in the “before” times until after

On October 24, 2024, Isaac Saul wrote a piece in Tangle (one of the best political news outlets around) about then-candidate Donald Trump’s “enemy from within” controversy.

I wrote a short essay in response, criticizing some of Mr. Saul’s points. It’s a little dated now, but I wanted to share an edited version of my thoughts on this blog, as I thought they were well-reasoned (and my fears have not been allayed in the first three months of Mr. Trump’s second presidency).


You [Isaac Saul] wrote this: “But none of us are going to live through World War II Germany.” How do you know that? What makes you so certain?

You say that Applebaum opens herself up to criticism by claiming Trump is speaking like Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin. And you imply that criticism is warranted because Trump didn’t round up and kill millions of people or make good on many of his claims the first time around. 

But you go on to say that, “Hitler did that before [emphasis mine] rounding up and killing millions of Jews.” Doesn’t that contradict the criticism? How do you know that Trump isn’t doing this before he deports 11 million people? Before he unleashes the military on US citizens and his political enemies? 

And let us not forget that Hitler also had a failed coup (The Beer Hall Putsch) years before being elected Chancellor and declaring himself Führer. Might January 6th have been Trump’s failed Beer Hall Putsch on his way to authoritarianism?

When you live in the “before” times, it’s hard to know what the “after” times will look like. So, we naturally (or at least I think we should) take people’s dangerous language at face value. 

Perhaps Trump didn’t do it the first time around because he had so many people keeping his worst impulses in check… I doubt he’ll have reasonable people like that the second go-around. He’s sure to fill his administration with sycophants and “yes men” because they’re the only ones who want anything to do with him anymore.

I’ve heard so many times that our system of checks and balances will keep an authoritarian dictator from taking over. 

I don’t believe that, and here’s why: Ancient Rome had checks and balances in its Senate. So did the governments of 1920s Italy and 1930s Germany. And they all fell to dictators. Caesar had massive popular support, and so did Hitler. They were practically handed their dictatorships.

The Jews of Nazi Germany also believed that they weren’t going to live through (what later became) WWII Nazi Germany either. They didn’t believe Hitler would make good on his claims because of the checks and balances their democracy had in place.

I’m quoting a German Jewish newspaper from February 2, 1933 (10 years before the “Final Solution”), which was quoted on page 23 of Timothy Snyder’s book On Tyranny:

“We do not subscribe to the view that Mr. Hitler and his friends, now finally in possession of the power they have so long desired, will implement the proposals circulating in [Nazi newspapers]; they will not suddenly deprive German Jews of their constitutional rights, nor enclose them in ghettos, nor subject them to the jealous and murderous impulses of the mob. They cannot do this because a number of crucial factors hold powers in check…and they clearly do not want to go down that road. When one acts as a European power, the whole atmosphere tends towards ethical reflection upon one’s better self and away from revisiting one’s earlier oppositional posture.”

That line: “When one acts as a European power…” could easily be rewritten as, “When one acts as an American…” Is it not some sort of “American Exceptionalism” to believe that “it can’t happen here?” 

Snyder goes on to write: 

“The mistake is to assume that rulers who came to power through institutions cannot change or destroy those very institutions—even when that is exactly what they have announced that they will do.”


Thanks for reading. I don’t often cover politics on this blog, but I thought it was worth sharing a little insight into my thoughts on this topic.

As is often the case with political issues I believe to be concerning, I hope I’m wrong.

Enjoyed this post? Subscribe to receive new ones directly in your inbox!

Make Your Voice Heard in Congress (and Get AI to Help)

Most people care about issues that affect their lives, but too few actually take the next step—contacting their elected representatives. Why? The biggest hurdles tend to be:

  1. Not knowing how to reach them
  2. Not believing it makes a difference
  3. Not knowing what to say

The good news? These are all solvable problems, and AI can help with every single one.

1. Finding Your Representatives

Many people don’t even know where to start. Luckily, it’s easier than ever to look up your representatives:

2. Does It Actually Matter?

Yes. Congressional offices track calls, emails, and letters. When an issue gets a high volume of outreach, it gets attention. Many policies have been shaped—or stopped—because enough people spoke up.

But the real power comes from multiplying your impact. Getting your friends and family involved can turn one letter into dozens. A single person might not change the world, but a network of voices can.

3. Not Sure What to Say? AI Can Help

One of the biggest obstacles people face is writing the message itself. That’s where AI comes in. If you care about an issue but don’t know how to word it, try this:

👉 “Write a letter to my senator about [issue] and why it matters.”

AI can structure your thoughts, keep things professional, and help you make a strong case. A well-written letter increases the chances of being taken seriously.

Start a Letter-Writing Campaign

Want to take it further? Organize a small group—friends, family, coworkers—and encourage them to write letters together. Offer to help them draft messages using AI. Even if only a few people participate, it makes a difference.

Take Action Today

Pick an issue you care about. Find your representatives. Write a letter (or get AI to help you). Then, ask two or three people you know to do the same.

Small actions lead to big changes. The key is getting started.

Stay in the loop. Subscribe today!

Mississippi elections are broken

Tuesday was the Mississippi Primary Election, and like a good citizen, I turned out to vote. 

I hate voting in primaries in this state. But this week, it was especially humiliating. 

As usual, I drove to the church, walked inside, and approached the table to check in. And like usual, I had to identify as either Democrat or Republican (even though I was hoping things might have changed).

Now, I’m a staunch independent and do not believe that either side is always right all the time. And in Mississippi, you are not required to register to vote as either one party or the other. You’re just registered to vote. 

But at the polls, they FORCE you to publicly declare your allegiance to one party or another. Out loud. Surrounded by a room full of people. Before you can get a ballot. 

Now, being a white man in the Deep South, I shocked almost everyone in the room by saying, “I guess Democrat.” The demeanor of the woman who was checking me in completely changed. The smile vanished, the friendly tone turned to ice. She handed me a ticket and said, “Over there,” pointing to a table at the back of the room.

I walked over with my ticket… and was informed they had no ballots. I was required to vote electronically. 

So here I am, already having lost my secret ballot (because everyone knows who you’re voting for if you say, “Democrat” as there’s only one option for each position). Now I had to stand in the spotlight with a group of other “self-proclaimed Democrats” with no privacy whatsoever. 

The voting machine was this huge, bright screen that had no coverings to keep your choices hidden. And you could feel the eyes on you and see heads shaking the whole time you were waiting. 

And because I had to cast my ballot electronically, while all the Republicans got to do theirs on paper (sitting at tables with privacy covers of course), I’m pretty sure my vote will get conveniently “lost.”

(I’m a little bitter, so maybe I’m wrong about this, but I’m venting). 

I don’t like being forced to vote on party lines. And no one should be forced to tell a group of total strangers which way they’re voting, whether they’re Democrat OR Republican. It’s no one else’s business. 

I know some people will say, “That’s not the point of the primary election. You have to pick one side or the other to get them to face off in the general election.” One, that’s not the point of this rant. And two, you shouldn’t EVER be forced to vote in black and white. But I digress.

The whole point of an election is to have a choice in who represents you and to make that choice secretly, privately, and safely. 

But do you really have a choice when you can only vote one way? And can you really feel safe during the process, especially as someone voting Democrat in a deeply red, über-Conservative state? Or as a Republican voting in a liberal one?

The point of this rant is to point out the evils in the system that exist to keep people from voting.

How many people turned away from the polls this week when they discovered they had to identify one way or the other? Republicans in the handful of mostly Democratic areas? Democrats in just about every part of this state? 

(You have to be one brave soul to declare yourself a “bleedin’ liberal” in a Deep South state like Mississippi.)

And, of course, independents like me who hate labels and hate having no real choice!

How many of them left the polls thinking, “Well, my vote didn’t count. Why did I even bother? Why should I come back at the general election? Or the next primary?”

Ask voters from other states—it doesn’t happen this way for them. And they are shocked when they find out this is how we do things here.

Regardless of your political leanings, you can’t honestly say that being forced to tell other people how you’re voting doesn’t feel just a little slimy. 

If that was the only change they made—a private way to get your (extremely limited) ballot rather than shouting it from the rooftops—that would be something. 

But the point, it seems, is to make voting uncomfortable, difficult, and frustrating. Because that lowers voter turnout. Which means nothing changes. 

The extreme people who shout the most, spread the most shit, and make people the angriest, are the ones who stay in power.  

Meanwhile, the moderates who want to get things done, who want to work across the aisle, who care about their PEOPLE rather than their CAREERS, are never heard from.

But again, that’s the point. Maintaining the status quo.

“You can have any color car you want,” Henry Ford once said of his Model T, “as long as it’s black.” 

I suppose we should change it here in Mississippi to, “as long as it’s red.”

(I genuinely don’t care what party you voted for—this isn’t right. If you want privacy and confidence in your vote, let me know. I’m working to figure out how, and to whom, to submit a petition to have this changed. I’ll need your signature.)